Today we got a taste of negotiating in a medium-sized group, as we discussed what sort of criteria should be used to evaluate the Eurovan vs. Onasti simulation, as well as some one-on-one negotiating in the form of the actual simulation. The premise was that I was a representative of the Eurovan government and I was up against the representative of the wealthy oil magnate Onasti.
The negotation itself went decently. I think the end result was a win-win situation, even though I did make some compromises I probably shouldn't have done, like the 100% tax reduction. I went to the negotiation table with the premise, that Eurovan absolutely needs the oil, even if it means having to be a bit more flexible what the instruction sheet said.
We agreed upon a deal that satisfied both parties involved since we both made some compromises. Overall, I had a positive feeling after the negotiation. We both were calm and respected each other during the discussion. That being said, there are some things I could have done better. Most of the time I kept looking at my papers instead of making proper eye-contact. I also have an annoying habit of shaking my right leg (which can be seen also in the video). For the next negotiation, these two things are definitely something I need to take into account. Also, I probably should be a bit more aggresive in the actual negotiating to get a better deal. Improving these matters will definitely be a good challenge for me.
No comments:
Post a Comment